Property

A Neighbor's Tree Over the Line: Who Owns It, Who May Trim It

4 min · Updated 2026-09-28

Who owns a tree near the line in California and Texas, the Texas right to trim branches to the line, and California's damages for tree injury.

Written by DueRivaLast reviewed: 2026-09-28Review standard

Who owns a tree near the line turns on where its trunk stands. In California the Civil Code says so in two short sections; in Texas, the State Law Library says there is no specific state statute, though court cases have addressed it, and the trunk’s location generally decides ownership, with exceptions. This page sets out what those sources say; it is not legal advice, and a dispute is a question for a lawyer.

Who owns a tree near the property line, and who may trim it
Where the tree isCalifornia (Civil Code)Texas (State Law Library)
Trunk wholly on one lotThe owner of that land, even if the roots grow into the neighbor’s land (§ 833)The trunk’s location generally decides who owns the tree, though there can be exceptions
Trunk on the lineThe owners of the lots it stands on, in common (§ 834)Not addressed in the State Law Library guide
Branches over the lineNot addressed in §§ 833, 834 or 3346The neighbor may trim limbs and branches back to the property line, but could be sued for injuring the tree or other property doing it

California: the trunk decides

Trees whose trunks stand wholly on one owner’s land belong only to that owner, although their roots grow into the land of another (Civil Code § 833). Trees whose trunks stand partly on the land of two or more adjoining owners belong to them in common (§ 834). Neither section, nor the damages section below, says anything about trimming a neighbor’s branches or roots; that question is one for a lawyer.

California: damages for injuring trees on another’s land

For wrongful injury to trees on another person’s land, or for removing them, the damages are three times the sum that would make up for the actual harm (Civil Code § 3346). They are twice the actual harm where the trespass was casual or involuntary, or where the person had probable cause to believe the land was their own or that of the person they worked for or at whose direction they acted. They are the actual harm alone where highway officers took the wood to repair a public highway or bridge on or next to the land, and where the person relied on a boundary survey that put the line in the wrong place, if they or their principal, lessor or immediate predecessor in title had the survey made and it was made by a land surveyor licensed in California. An action for these damages must be brought within five years of the trespass.

Texas: court cases, and trimming to the line

The Texas State Law Library’s neighbor law guide says Texas does not have a specific state statute on trees across a boundary line, though court cases have addressed it. It says the trunk’s location generally determines who owns the tree, though there can be exceptions, and that a neighboring landowner has the right to trim or cut off the limbs or branches to the property line, but could be sued for injuring the tree or other property in the process. Cities may have their own tree rules, and a property owners’ association may regulate tree maintenance.

City tree rules can apply too

Austin and Los Angeles regulate some trees, and removing or pruning one can need a city permit; the tree removal permit guide sets out which trees each city regulates and what it asks for.

Primary sources

What this page was checked against

  • California Civil Code § 833: Trees whose roots extend into another's land

    California Legislature · checked 2026-09-28

    Used for: Trees whose trunks stand wholly on one owner's land belong exclusively to that owner, although their roots grow into another's land (enacted 1872).

  • California Civil Code § 834: Line trees

    California Legislature · checked 2026-09-28

    Used for: Trees whose trunks stand partly on the land of two or more coterminous owners belong to them in common (enacted 1872).

  • California Civil Code § 3346: Wrongful injury to trees

    California Legislature · checked 2026-09-28

    Used for: Wrongful injury to or removal of trees on another's land: three times the actual detriment; twice where the trespass was casual or involuntary or the defendant had probable cause to believe the land was their own or that of the person in whose service or by whose direction they acted; the actual detriment where highway officers took the wood to repair a public highway or bridge, and where the defendant acted in reliance on a survey by a surveyor licensed in California that misplaced the line and the defendant, or their principal, lessor or immediate predecessor in title, procured it; actions within five years (Stats. 1957, ch. 2346).

  • Neighbor Law: Trees

    Texas State Law Library · checked 2026-09-28

    Used for: No specific state statute on trees crossing a boundary, though court cases have addressed it; the trunk's location generally determines ownership, with exceptions; a neighboring landowner may trim or cut off limbs or branches to the property line, but could be sued for injuring the tree or other property; cities and property owners' associations may regulate trees.